The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes, from three different sources, between 1990 and 2005.
The information about the air pollution emission in UK from three different sources during the period of 1990 to 2005 is shown in the line chart. The figures are given in millions of tonnes. Overall, it can be seen that there is a downward trend of air pollution in total which the household contributed the least level of pollution over the period.
To begin with, in 1900, the total level of pollution was 8 which was all time the highest level of pollution. Following this, it declined steadily by 3 to finish at 5 in the last period. The highest level of pollution in 1900 caused mainly by the industry sector which stood at 6 while the others had a similar number of 1 in 1900. After that, the level of pollution emitted by industry sector fell gradually to 2.5 in 2002. Nevertheless, the contribution from household sector remained unchanged at 1 until 1999 before decreasing by 0.5 in 2002. Similarly, the transport’s pollution level fluctuated around 1 until 1999 which then increased to 2.5 in 2002 as same as those of industry sector in that year.
Moving to the remaining period, transportation turned to play the major role in air pollution emission instead of industry sector. The pollution from transportation increased to reach a peak of 3 in 2005. While, industry sector and household were all had a similar movement which plunged to their low of 2 and no emission respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st level of pollution over the period. To begin with, in 1900, the total level ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...those of industry sector in that year. Moving to the remaining period, transpor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82644628099 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86035194998 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7829102599 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193677701541 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849019069005 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932154588141 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16634974879 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12334015908 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.