In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others.
Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the technological advancement change people’s lifestyle rapidly. Instead of having a face-to-face communication, people shop, work, and contact with others via the internet. There are many advantages and disadvantages of this situation which will be further discussed in this essay.
Various positive effects from using online communication can be identified. First, the long distant communication is possible in a real time basis. If it is compared to the past, the most convenient way of communication in a long distance is using a letter which had a lead time for more than 1 day for receiving. Thus, using the internet leading to a probability to contact with others instantly in just a click. In addition, the internet brings about convenience to people’s life. This is because the internet facilitate people to shop, work and contact at any time and any places. For example, it is unnecessary to go to the department store to buy a goods but this can be done at home at any time. A further effect of convenience from using the internet is that people will take less time in making a decision to purchase or invest. Hence, this can also enhance the economic progress of the country.
On the other hand, using the internet without face-to-face contact could contribute to several drawbacks. First, the disclosure of information in the internet might be unsafety. Since people hardly examine system, policy and security of platform’s database, it is possible that the information provided by the users may be used improperly and disclosed to others. As a result, the misused of information in the internet in an individual level could give a rise to the enormous effect to our society. What is more, it is more difficult to build a strong relationship without face-to-face communication. This is because the feelings from the internet based communication are different from meeting people in the real place due to lack of tones, senses, and gestures. Consequently, the clear understanding among each party might be lost.
In conclusion, there are several advantages and disadvantages in online communication. However, in my opinion, I think the benefits outweigh the drawbacks as the convenience advantage play the most important role in the present day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be further discussed in this essay. Various positive effects from using onli...
^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a good' or simply 'goods'?
Suggestion: a good; goods
...ry to go to the department store to buy a goods but this can be done at home at any tim...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23641304348 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17424804664 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9183693349 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7619047619 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38095238095 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299881077286 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855417264833 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108331782492 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165617214083 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10140208124 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.