The graph compares the percentage of international and the percentages of international students gaining a second class degree or better at a major UK university.
The bar chart is illustrating enrollment in second class degrees or higher education at dominant UK university. It is expressed by percentages in different classes with two distinct comparisons which are local and international students.
By in large picture, bars are showing that there was no major difference, but in the detailed view, both nursing and accountancy have exactly the same participation. Other classes including sociology, art history, English literature, has slightly higher participation of local students. On the other side, this trend was reversed in an electrical engineering major.
Besides, there is two noticeable difference perceived in the chart. The first one is detected from information technology with an approximately 20% higher variance in international students. Another interesting fact spotted in international law. Even the class name is described as “international” terminology, the overall attendees for this class expressing totally different performances. Supporting the fact, UK student attendance was nearly 70% but international students were lower than 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-11 | tamir052222 | 84 | view |
- kkk 3
- It has recently been announced that a high school in your community would refuse bad-record students. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details in your answer. 90
- Some people think that the government should provide unemployed people with a free mobile phone and free access to the internet to help them find jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any r 84
- liner graph 11
- working four days a week 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98742138365 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47280312375 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.723270440252 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1217451231 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278461793616 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094519642805 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687226302113 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183220405557 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989845791063 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 61.2550243902 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.4140731707 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.