The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 2011 to 2013.
The given chart illustrates the amount of the production of coffee in top four countries between 2011 and 2013.
Overall, it is notable that all of these four nations witnessed a dramatic rise in the total capacity of coffee produced over the period of three years. Moreover, Brazil produced the largest deal of coffee out of the remaining countries.
As can be seen from the chart, starting at over 40 000 tonnes in the first year, the amount of coffee in Brazil peaked at above 50 000 tonnes in 2012 before declining slightly of about 100 tonnes a year later. Meanwhile, the figure for Vietnam in 2011 stood at only 23 000 which was two times less than that for the former. The next year experienced a moderate decrease of about 100 tonnes, which was followed by a substantial rise to approximately 30 000 tonnes in 2013.
Looking at the chart in more detail, both Indonesia and Colombia recorded a gradual upward trend throughout the given time period. To be specific, the amount of the production of coffee of these two countries stood at nearly the same point, at about 9000 tonnes. After that, while the figure for Indonesia at the last year hit the highest point at over 10 000 tonnes, that for Colombia was slightly smaller, at about 10 000 tonnes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65919282511 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42775315897 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533632286996 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3187671366 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168353244768 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833263985959 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823582782272 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130231007779 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880579850639 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.