The graph show average carbon dioxide Emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
The given linear layout reveals that information about the carbon dioxide gas emissions each person in the United Kingdom such namely as; sweden, Portugal, and Italy by during the year 1967 from 2007. The data is calibrated in metric tones units. It is clear and coherent representation.
It can be observed that, in the year 1967 to 2007 the United Kingdom which was being consumed carbon dioxide to peak 11 metric tonnes but, after sometime they are declined slightly about 10 metric tonnes. Whereas, Sweden had utilised Co2 of slightly upwards trend to 10 and however , abruptly, dropped away downward trend.
As manifested, the carbon dioxide emissions under 4 to 8 and 1 to 5 metric tonnes respectively moved in the upward trend which shows that Italy and Portugal nation.
Overall it is evident that, UK and Sweden is far ahead of other countries to consumed carbon dioxide. However, while other Italy and Portugal were consumed meetly carbon dioxide 1967 to 2007 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...slightly upwards trend to 10 and however , abruptly, dropped away downward trend....
^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ards trend to 10 and however , abruptly, dropped away downward trend. As mani...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1 to 5 metric tonnes respectively moved in the upward trend which shows that Ita...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04294478528 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45867087322 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6741149913 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339157564904 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130644263202 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109863017264 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209795102858 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656238031907 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.