The graph shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007,
Discuss summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparison wherever necessary
The given line graph illustrates the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per individual in four countries ( United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal) between 1967 and 2007, units are mentioned in metric tonnes.
Overall, in the period of four decade, United Kingdom had a steady decrease, but Sweden showed a rather steep decline in CO2 emission. However, Carbon dioxide emission per person in Italy and Portugal has been consistently increasing.
In the year 1967, United Kingdom and Sweden had around 11 and 9 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions per person respectively. As United Kingdom appeared to be in decreasing trend in the following decades, although this country has the maximum carbon dioxide emission (little above 8 metric tonnes of emission) in 2007, On the other hand, Sweden had a sharp rise in the year 1977 (more than 10metric tonnes) and a deep decrease in emissions after that with over 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
Italy and Portugal were the least CO2 emission countries in 1967, but showed increasing fashion till 2007. Italy tops the chart in second placeby emitting almost 8 metric tonnes of CO2 in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issions per individual in four countries United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portu...
^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
...nnes. Overall, in the period of four decade, United Kingdom had a steady decrease, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d Kingdom and Sweden had around 11 and 9 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions per perso...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove 8 metric tonnes of emission in 2007, On the other hand, Sweden had a sharp ri...
^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... almost 8 metric tonnes of CO2 in 2007.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06989247312 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47459633252 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.0441303111 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40999036606 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218740466748 0.103423049105 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929204329932 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279836129561 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710820188374 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.