The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates data about the earnings of three bakehouse in the US over a period of 10 years in £.
Overall, it is obvious that robbie's bakery had a substantial income, which turns out to be the highest of all over the given decade.

To begin with, bemie's burns renumeration stood at 20,000 £ in the year 2000, it saw a slight increase 3 years after accounting for about 38,000 £, after which she had a steady earnings over the following 6 years period, it thereafter plunged to over 60,000£ in 2010. On the other hand, lovely loaves had a significantly great allowance for a start, which is unarguably the highest of them all, 80,000£, after which saw a gradual decrease over a 3 year period, I however leveled off to 40,000£ in 2008, since then the figure remained constant.

On the other hand, Robbie's bakery generated an income of 5,000£ for a start in 2000,and therefore remained constant over the following 5 years. It thereafter saw a gradual rise and then dramatically increased, she saw her highest income in 2010 owning to about 102,000£ which was the highest of all the 3 bakeries in the US.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bakehouse' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'bakehouses'.
Suggestion: bakehouses
...trates data about the earnings of three bakehouse in the US over a period of 10 years in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
..., bemies burns renumeration stood at 20,000 £ in the year 2000, it saw a slight incre...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...e 3 years after accounting for about 38,000 £, after which she had a steady earnings ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...eriod, it thereafter plunged to over 60,000£ in 2010. On the other hand, lovely loav...
^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
... unarguably the highest of them all, 80,000£, after which saw a gradual decrease ove...
^^^^
Line 4, column 489, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...ear period, I however leveled off to 40,000£ in 2008, since then the figure remained...
^^^^
Line 6, column 60, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...Robbies bakery generated an income of 5,000£ for a start in 2000,and therefore remai...
^^^^
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thereafter saw a gradual rise and then dramatically increased, she saw her high...
^^
Line 6, column 267, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...hest income in 2010 owning to about 102,000£ which was the highest of all the 3 bake...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, therefore, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70351758794 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63930581852 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56783919598 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9897427804 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100222235228 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662494757796 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565218715624 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836540539047 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599965484869 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.