Nowadays young people deliberately damage public places. Why is it happening? What could be solution for it
It is not a surprise that youth are found to intentionally destroy public facilities nowadays.
An adage says, ' an idle hand is the devil's workshop. In this essay I will explore the reasons for the damages and the solution likewise.
When youth are not engaged in some activities, they tend to expend energy on things pleasurable to them. It has been found that at this age, there is youthful exuberance, they become restless and indulge in various vices.
Another reason is peer pressure. The kind of friends they keep can influence their actions. The kind of people they regard as mentors also have significant roles they play in their lives.
Social media also has a role to play in moulding the lives of our youth. Free access to the internet without proper parental regulation or restriction to what is been viewed matters a lot. For instance, a child that is used to watching violent movies might however have violent ideologies to situations.
Proper parental guidance and training can solve some of this issues as it is said that 'charity begins at home'. Engaging them in various sporting activities could keep them busy especially at schools. It could fashion what their future could be as some of them could end up taking some of the sports as a profession.
Government could also provide various social amenities within communities to engage them in particular vocations.
Better government policies in terms of free education could enable the children of low income earners attend schools especially in developing countries.
In conclusion, engaging young people in physical sport, good parenting at younger age, better government policies would do a lot of good in preventing young people from deliberately damaging public places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-18 | nguyen quang phuc lam | 76 | view |
| 2020-07-04 | biodun | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that using animals as a medical experiment for drugs is harmfull while some are against this opinion Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Many people say that cooking and eating at home is better for the individual and the family than eating out in restaurants or canteens Do you agree or disagree 67
- In choosing a job money is to be considered To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lic facilities nowadays. An adage says, an idle hand is the devils workshop. In ...
^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devils'' or 'devil's'?
Suggestion: devils'; devil's
...s. An adage says, an idle hand is the devils workshop. In this essay I will explore ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this age, there is youthful exuberance, they become restless and indulge in vari...
^^
Line 10, column 57, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...guidance and training can solve some of this issues as it is said that charity begin...
^^^^
Line 10, column 282, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... be as some of them could end up taking some of the sports as a profession. Government c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16783216783 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66213223132 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2697582232 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9411764706 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18723688089 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046877831343 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625120913323 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675761157558 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581182009758 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.