The graph shows information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010
The line graph compares the numbers of international meetings taken in 3 different metropolises during the period of 30 years from 1980.
Overall, the numbers of conferences in city A and city B declined over the given period while the figure for city C tended to increase. Additionally, it is clearly seen that the most significant differences belonged to city C.
In 1980, 35 meetings was hosted in city A, which marked this city rank first in 3 cities whereas that of city B was 30. Despite similar fluctuations, these figures declined slightly in general and by the year 2000, both cities had hosted 27 international conferences. However, city A was overtaken by city B at the ending point of the given time, with 27 and 25 meetings in order.
There was no international conference which was hosted in city C in 1980. In the next decade, this city had been a venue for 20 conferences. this city continued to rise considerably, hitting a peak at 35 in 2000. Although it fell slightly to 31 meetings in the last year, it still remained higher than the numbers of other cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nificant differences belonged to city C. In 1980, 35 meetings was hosted in city ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ty had been a venue for 20 conferences. this city continued to rise considerably, hi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, still, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88046241286 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1325434328 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228686251799 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100504841169 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650614540696 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150934395371 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012166091058 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.