The graph shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
The given line chart below illustrates that how many shops in a particular country opened and closed from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, it is clear that, initially opening new stores were prominent which dropped during the period, while the reverse was true for the closure of shops. However, the least amount of stores closed in 2015.
According to the graph, the significant amount of new shops inaugurated in 2011 whose numbers were around 8,500, which then declined sharply to 4000 in the next year, before soaring back steadily to above 6000 in 2014. During the same period, shop closeness undergo minimal change, which first fell to 6000 in 2012, then grew back to 7100 in 2013 and by 2014, it plunged to 6,500. Although, minimum numbers of retailers abandoned businesses in 2015 at 500 only, their rate showed resilience and return back to 4000 which remained unchanged until 2018. In comparison, the initiation of new shops plateaued between 2015 and 2016, before plummeting to 4000, and finally with a further drop of 1000, its number stood at 3000 at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 496, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
... only, their rate showed resilience and return back to 4000 which remained unchanged until ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89130434783 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34026560462 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4655873859 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338246236421 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137138818431 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077435504922 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205515730124 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941156492008 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.