The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph represents the total number of people that has visited a specific Caribbean island from 2010 till 2017, as well as how many of them chose to live in hotels and cruise ships.
Overall, the total number of tourists to the Caribbean nation have showed a steady increase through out the time period. While the number of people choosing to stay on ships and hotels have varied, it also mostly recorded a growth as well.
In 2010, a total of only 1 million visitors came to spend their vacations on the island, after which it saw a constant rise in the number of tourists till around 2015, when it plateaued. Afterwards, it rose again sharply and reached 3.5 million visitors, which is the highest number so far.
Some of these individuals chose to spend their vacations on a cruise ship while others decided to stay in a hotel. Initially more people were staying on the land than on cruise ships, as hotel occupancy was twice as much as the ship’s. These trends saw some fluctuations over the years and in the 2017, the opposite happened. As in 2017, close to 1 million were living on lands and 1.5 million on the cruise liners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...an nation have showed a steady increase through out the time period. While the number of pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61951219512 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31507487644 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565853658537 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9097602115 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24618816549 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915828345504 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936767369947 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156566809286 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905765399713 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.