The graph shows the percentage of female members of Parliament in European countries between 2000 and 2012.
The line graph represents the data about the female worker`s percentage in European countries` parliament from 2000 to 2021.
Overall, the percentage of women who worked in Italian and the United Kingdom’s parliament are considerably increased over the twelve years, however, the percentage of employed women in the parliaments of France, Germany and Belgium slightly increased.
Regarding France, Germany and UK female workers` percentage, in the beginning of the new millennium it was 25%, approximately 35% and 5%, respectively. Until 2012, there was a steady increase in the proportion of employed women in Germany and France, conversely, the rate of working women in the United Kingdom rose sharply to about 25%.
Turning to Italian and Belgium female workers` percentage, in 2000 it was more than 25% and 15% respectively. Then, until 2012, there was a stable growth in the ratio of both countries. For comparison, in 2012, the rate of Belgian female workers decreased from about 25% to more than 20%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies' parliament from 2000 to 2021. Overall, the percentage of women who wor...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted Kingdom rose sharply to about 25%. Turning to Italian and Belgium female wo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14641489641 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3294400729 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228131530426 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109714795279 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980030116806 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157909648873 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108596189837 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.