In the past, important knowledge of culture and history was stored in museums. Nowadays information
is freely available on the internet, so there is no longer a need for museums. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?
Historically, individuals preserved their items, treasures in museums in order to convey information, to future generations, that took place in prehistoric times or in the past. However, now due to the advent of technology people do not need places like museums, because data about anything can be found in various websites. I partly agree with this statement because of numerous reasons which will be explained further.
On the one hand, museums are outdated and useless, therefore, there is no need to keep them. Firstly, they occupy huge areas where useful constructions could be built. Namely, hospital, universities and schools could benefit humanity. Secondly, internet can provide us with information that we would not have been able to obtain by studying the exhibits in the museum. In other words, there huge number of websites that are teeming with illustrations and photos of artifacts from all museums. As an example, Wikipedia is a website with a surfeit of data about everything.
On the flip side, we cannot deny the importance of museums. First of all, the museum provides us with reliable information that can hardly be found on the Internet. The existence of varied resources of information in the internet, which mostly written by amateur journalists or writers, doubts reliability of that data. Moreover, museum houses keep the original versions of the exhibits which are highly valuable for those who anticipate art. If the museum disappears, the precious materials and pictures as Mona Lisa, Stary night, which are stored in museums, may also disappear.
In conclusion, despite the convenience and possibilities of the Internet, I still think that museums are worth preserving because they are museums are creditable pace which can store humanity`s heritage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...um. In other words, there huge number of websites that are teeming with illustrat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35106382979 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90611653313 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1670850181 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200347493448 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611585363053 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491847160881 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120638578481 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303293382649 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.