The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
At fleeting glance the bar graph depicts the information regarding the men and women academic staff members across the faculties of a major university during the given time period 2012. The data is calibrated in percentile.
Overall, the most striking feature apparent from this presentation is that maximum males were witnessed in engineering. However, the uncausal feature that cannot be ignored is that minimum females were also seen in engineering.
Highlighting the presentation it is clear that, the maximum ratio of men was about 82% in engineering while the ratio of women was around 20%. In arts faculty the percentage of feminine was 55% than masculine was around 42%. In medicine field the ratio of both the gender was equal 50%. In education the percentile of women was 75% and men was about 22%.
Moreover, the ratio of males were 20% more than females were 40%. In business and science field the percentile of both the gender masculine and feminine was equal around 62% and 38% accordingly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ratio of both the gender was equal 50%. In education the percentile of women was 7...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07185628743 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68952280788 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8270942278 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184040846388 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626743671346 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108253248661 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121124133372 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128890779232 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.