Two maps show the changes of a coastal town, called Pentland, from 1957 to 2007.
The layout regarding the Pentland which is a small coastal town observed an alternation between 1950 and 2007 is illustrated by the given development chart.
On having an overall, it is apparent that, the town undergone some radical changes. The principle changes is that, Pentland was facilitated with numbers of developments and become a commercial area.
Upon analysing the presentation, in case of structure of coastal in 1950, it is cleared that the town was divided in four parts with the help of roads. The town had an industrial area which was in the west direction; contrastingly, the car park in the east side also witnessed by the town. In addition the main part of the town was sea that was in the north side while the rest of area was covered by the grassland.
After more than half century, the Pentland was well-developed but the partion of the town was similar to previous years. The industrial area was replaced by a swimming pool, a small park alongwith multi storey car park. There were many shops on the corner of the roads and facilitated by yacht marina instead of sea. Moreover, the north-east corner was filled with appartments, however the east-south include houses. For the enjoyment of peole the facility of cinemas were available in the west-south direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ast side also witnessed by the town. In addition the main part of the town was sea that ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79691655103 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2617161451 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133494252036 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539741219542 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523907592111 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100941964611 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493391639846 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.