The line graph compares the production of energy from coal in Sweden, France, Denmark and Germany
between 1995 and 2010. Overall, the percentage of energy produced from coal declined in all four countries
over the timeframe.
There was a dramatic fall in the production in Denmark and Germany. Denmark’s production of energy from
coal stood at 60% in 1995, higher than the other four countries. However, production levels dropped sharply
over the next 15 years to finish at 10% in 2010, which was the lowest of that year. Energy production from
coal in Germany followed a similar pattern, beginning the period at just under 60% and falling significantly,
though unlike Denmark it fell to a low of only 5% in 2007 and then increased again to approximately 18%.
In contrast, Sweden and France saw more moderate falls over the period. 35% of energy came from coal in
Sweden in 1995, and this proportion gradually declined over the period to finish at approximately 28% in
2010, the highest of the four countries, while the percentage produced in France remained just under that of Sweden over the 15-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l in Sweden, France, Denmark and Germany between 1995 and 2010. Overall, the perc...
^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from coal declined in all four countries over the timeframe. There was a drama...
^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any. Denmark’s production of energy from coal stood at 60% in 1995, higher than t...
^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wever, production levels dropped sharply over the next 15 years to finish at 10% ...
^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est of that year. Energy production from coal in Germany followed a similar patte...
^^^
Line 8, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ust under 60% and falling significantly, though unlike Denmark it fell to a low o...
^^^
Line 11, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period. 35% of energy came from coal in Sweden in 1995, and this proportion grad...
^^^
Line 12, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...period to finish at approximately 28% in 2010, the highest of the four countries,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06951871658 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63496942232 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4514082574 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360520704503 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172525253222 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123322275762 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153327024654 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123694215002 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.