The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line graph illustrates the number of senior citizens in the past and their future number for three different countries namely USA, Sweden, Japan in percentage between 1940 and 2040. In general, the USA and Sweden show a similar trend of fluctuations as well as a gradual increase to a certain extent whereas for Japan the changes are overall gentle but rapid at the end of the period.
To begin with, in the USA, initially, people who aged 65 or more were about 9% during 1940 and showed a slight increase over the next 20 years, after which it showed a significant change of 5% for following two decades. From there it reached and maintained a plateau till 2018 (approximately). Maintaining an increasing trend from the leveled portion expected populace of elderly people is around 22%.
Sweden followed a similar trend like the USA till 1980 with a 6% initial population of aged people of the mentioned age. Then decreasing slightly between 1980 and 2000 it reached a peak of 20% somewhere between 2000 and 2020. Again suffering a decline just after 2020 the anticipated older people of 65 or more is 25%, a slightly higher than the USA.
On the contrary, Japan had the lowest elderly people with 5% in 1940 as compared to others and experiencing a 2% declination it plateaued for one or two years after 1980. As the period of stability ended in 1980, a gradual increased took place and is projected to do so until it reaches 10% between 2020 and 2040. From there encountering a gradual escalation following a steep surge at around 2025 it will be 27%.
To conclude proportionate populace of senior citizen of Japan was the lowest at 1940 from there it reaches maximum percentage after a century as compared to the USA or Sweden. Also for USA and Sweden the era 2020 to 2040 a gradual increment will be observed on the contrary to Japan, which will see a sudden boom in elderly population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children's sport and participation in different sports in the UK from 2008 to 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewable in the year 2009 87
- Many processed foods and ready-made meals contain preservatives and chemicals.What are the advantages to this?Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 61
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ntury as compared to the USA or Sweden. Also for USA and Sweden the era 2020 to 2040...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, whereas, as for, in general, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 965.302439024 163% => OK
No of words: 334.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70658682635 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63048105864 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52994011976 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 283.868780488 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8172116031 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.923076923 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192118602229 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626737033345 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646971041118 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103146190557 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439366756062 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.