The chart provides a simple breakdown of consumer expenditure on five common products in France and the UK in 2010.
A brief assessment of the data reveals that, while people in the UK spent more on cars, books, and cameras, expenditure in France was higher for computers and perfume.
The greatest amount of expenditure in both countries was on cars. In the UK, just over 450000 was spent on this category, while in France the figure was moderately lower at around 400000. Books were the product with the second-highest level of expenditure in the UK at marginally over 400000, while in France spending on books was noticeably lower at approximately 300000. The most substantial difference was in spending on cameras, with the UK’s figure of a little more than 350000 being much higher than France’s more meager 150000.
In the remaining two categories, the French spent more on computers than their UK counterparts, although the difference (380000 vs. 350000) was not that significant. Finally, people in France spent a considerably larger amount on perfume than people in the UK, with the latter expending 200000 and the former around 145000.
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewable in the year 2009 87
- The charts above show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report of at least 150 words describing the information shown. 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 11
- The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children's sport and participation in different sports in the UK from 2008 to 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15343915344 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86141166503 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513227513228 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0079725889 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997398430979 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561958552061 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787690284055 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885145337457 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885232486417 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.