The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London.
The line graph demonstates how many people using London Underground station in different periods in one day.
Overall, there are some fluctuations in the numbers of London station users, which reaches its peaks at 8.30 AM and 18.30 PM while hitting the bottom at 16.00 PM.
Initailly at the beginning of the day, the figure for passengers stands at 100 but instantly quadruples to 400 in just one hour and a half later. 10.00 sees a swift decline in the number of users with approximately 180 individuals going underground train. However, from 11.00 onwards, passengers travel more as the data racorded gradually increases by more than 100, reaching to 300 at 14.30.
The same pattern could be seen from the rest of the day. At 16.00 the number dips to its starting point of below 100, being the lowest of the day but bounces back in 2 hours later with the similar four-time jump to 400 before troughing back to over 100 at 20.00. Finally, there is hardly any changes in the figure, just varying back and forth between 100 and 150.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g underground train. However, from 11.00 onwards, passengers travel more as the d...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... 11.00 onwards, passengers travel more as the data racorded gradually increases b...
^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the number dips to its starting point of below 100, being the lowest of the day b...
^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he day but bounces back in 2 hours later with the similar four-time jump to 400 b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71978021978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44633871718 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664835164835 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5675933076 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182592479403 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769682811485 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814710336119 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128441186038 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849610372462 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.