The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
The given bar graphs compare the proportional change that happened over a period of eight years from 2002 to 2010 in the context of computer owners surveyed with regard to population and educational level.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the demand for computers witnessed an increasing pattern over time. Although computer earned immense popularity among all the people with different educational backgrounds, bachelor's and post-graduates remained at the leading list.
According to the given illustration, over half of the population owned a computer in 2002. Thereafter, the number of people who had a computer in their homes observed a significant rising pattern. Every three out of five people possessed a computer in 2004, followed by a 5% increase in the next two years. Furthermore, by the end of the period, more than three-quarters of the population purchased a computer.
With regard to qualification, almost each post-graduate and 9 in every 10 graduates held a computer in 2010, which was higher by nearly 20% as compared to the earlier year. In addition, proportion of school droppers, high school graduates, and college students with incomplete degrees climbed to 40%, 70%, and 80% respectively, compared to just 15%, 30%, and 50% as is given in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | Binhchuduy | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | faztaz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010 84
- The bar graph on average weekly household expenditure by region 2007 09 78
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata 87
- The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34134615385 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09970159258 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639423076923 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0529389886 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237213478896 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913576786577 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844253008995 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148813050898 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875664406566 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.