The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the
population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and
2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The charts show rates of computer ownership from 2002–2010, including a more detailed look at ownership patterns by level of education.
These data show a constant increase in the percentage of the population that owned computers during the eight-year timeframe. This rising trend occurred across all education levels. However, although having more education correlated directly with higher computer ownership percentages from 2002–2010, the ownership percentage increased most among those with the least education during those years.
In 2002, slightly more than half the population owned computers. That number increased to roughly 75% over the next eight years. Postgraduates were always ahead of the general population. While roughly three quarters of postgraduates owned computers in 2002, that rose to nearly 95% by 2010. By contrast, those who had not finished high school began with only a 15% computer ownership rate, which increased to about 45% after eight years.
Notably, the three groups at the lowest end of the education spectrum saw the most significant computer ownership gains over this period. Their rate rose approximately 30 percentage points. College graduates and postgraduates saw more modest gains with 20 point increases between 2002 and 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79415312155 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0867272055 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231262030565 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810014663178 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591595319743 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154539234262 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327694669631 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.