The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two bar charts examine the popularity of owning computers as varying throughout the years 2002 to 2010. Further, the grouped bar chart stratifies the data by educational level, thus allowing for another trend to be illustrated.
Apparently, utilization of a private computer had been on the rise over time, with a total increase of around 25 per cent from 2002 to 2010. Such increase was almost perfectly gradual, without a major leap here or there. However, the composition of computer holders seemingly varied between the starting point and the end point. That is, in 2002, individuals at a college level of education or higher made a more significant ratio of the overall users.
As for years of education, it seems that the chronological effect was even more accentuated for lower educational stages. For example, the segment with no high school diploma almost tripled, while holders of a bachelor degree or above only saw their ownership increasing by around 20 per cent.
In conclusion, computer ownership had definitely gone up during the years in question. Considering educational level, as well, this effect was yet more pronounced in case of lower levels of schooling.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, thus, well, while, as for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17616580311 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84075833484 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668393782383 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8072570027 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225919787999 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840798542489 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472424348373 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131216044127 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302809793852 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.