Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
A thorny issue to approach in time of heated ideologization, the question of gender differences and their implications in social, political, and economic roles has been on the rise for quite a bit now and it does not seem to be coming to a halt. One objective approach to the comparison comes from a rigorously measureable area: biology. However, the exact consequences of those consensually distinct biological traits can be subject to further analysis.
For example, it is now well-established that muscular mass is larger in males in comparison to females. Sports records also acknowledge this fact very clearly, whether in terms of tennis's fastest serve or marathon's shortest time. On the other hand, though, any attempt to convey such advantage to contemporary tasks would be met with an opposing force of modernism. That is, the highly mechanized and technological lifestyle of nowadays cancels out the physical advantage in most cases, especially in urban places, where service economy seems to be more prevailing.
Another aspect of those physical differences, however, can still have a robust impact on social asprects, for it is in straight relation with the main structure of any nation: the family. Namely, the aesthetic advantage of female bodies and how they affect both men and women's development and personality-shaping is still wittnessed, however less severe. Despite major shifts from the typical understanding of both genders thanks to feminism, there seems to be an inescapeable degree of specialization that maintains the spirit of the family.
All in all, while the very physical differences between the two genders rarely account for an inherent advantage in most modern tasks, the psychological and social adaptations that follow therefrom can well do so. Also, the extent to which such adaptations were respected or even encouraged determines the relative amount of gender specialization. While this can incur economic losses to the current form of social texture, its social advatages might well offtake them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'tenniss the fastest'.
Suggestion: tenniss the fastest
... fact very clearly, whether in terms of tenniss fastest serve or marathons shortest time. On th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'marathons the shortest'.
Suggestion: marathons the shortest
...er in terms of tenniss fastest serve or marathons shortest time. On the other hand, though, any at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39375 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10311713242 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4272290162 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.769230769 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127883541316 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390369295042 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277141021635 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702959370635 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00741484303859 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.