The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graphs depict the percentage of computer ownership from 2002 to 2010 in comparison to the general population as well as by degree of educational attainment. As illustrated in the given graphs, there is an increase in ownership over the years as well as among people with higher education level.
According to the first graph, in 2002, about 50 percent of the population owned a computer. This number steadily increased over the years reaching above 60 percent in 2006 and, at the end of the period, reached its highest percentage at approximately 70 percent.
The second graph illustrates a direct correlation between computer ownership and educational attainment; i.e., the higher the education level, the bigger is the percentage. In 2002, about 15 percent of high school undergraduates owned a computer compared to about 35 percent among high school graduates. This percentage further increased across education levels with the most computers are owned by postgraduate qualifiers at about 70 percent. A similar trend is noted in 2010 with 40 percent of high school undergraduates owning a computer in contrast to more than 90 percent among postgraduate qualifiers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32085561497 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04822215823 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6795151823 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256291842749 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132995964507 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758392744669 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187721246843 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657090876866 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.