The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia.
Revealed in the bar charts are how many citizens of the Republic of Freedonia by genders per thousand worked in 6 different areas between 1975 and 1995.
At a single glance, at the beginning of the period, the number of males in the six given sectors was considerably higher than that of females, at the end of the year, the figure for female workers in communication, wholesale & retail trade area surpassed those of males.
In the preliminary year, both males and females preferred working in public sector (non-defence) and wholesale & retail trade, accounting for an average of 850 for males and 600 for females out of 1000 respectively. By contrast, public sector (defence) was the least popular job for citizens in the Republic of Freedonia, recording about 3 for men and around 210 for woman per thousand. As for manufacturing job, roughly 620 of males per thousand working in the area more than doubled that of females; in addition, the same trend could also be seen when comparing the finance/ banking area.
In 1995, it is worth noting that a reverse trend was highlighted in predilection of job choices for both genders, with the number of females in communications sector increasing to about 550 per thousand and overtaking that of males with 300 out of 1000. Similarly, the figure for females in wholesale & retail trade also grew by around 250 per thousand and exceeded that of males. A dramatic difference could not be witnessed in the rest of sectors in 1995.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88844621514 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74298715782 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533864541833 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8809032045 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.375 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20761078501 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992761722604 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437537215312 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13740139188 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159708457446 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.