The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.
The line graph gives information regards count of employees by their sex in six employment sections of the republic in freedonia during era of 1975 and 1995.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing graph that, public sector which was non- defence, represented similar count of male (850) and female (650) during couple of years with difference of 200 numbers. Yet, in public sector which was of defence, revealed least count of women in comparison to men with difference of 120 and 100 during couple of eras. Apart from that, in both of two years, female (300) and male (700) shown same count of number with distinction of 400 respectively.
Furthermore, in 1975, communication section had similar numerical of male and female workers which was around 300. On contrast, in 1995, this section revealed huge difference in number of couple of workers, that was female (600) and male (300). Apart from that, in first year, finance sector had less number of women employees (150) rather than men (500). Yet, in second era, same section represented same number in employee of both sexes with 500. Lastly, in wholesale and retail trade, during 1975, there was difference of 100 numericals in male and female workers. Yet, in 1995, this difference became decreased with 50.
Overall, in public sector of diffence, couple of workers represented least number, yet in other sections, they were domain disturbance in their count during both of years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, so, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94583333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51950378161 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504166666667 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2529881213 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.909090909 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263010966037 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108935507551 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595913990551 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166639062188 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584875439553 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.