How will the proposed study contribute to your career*?
I chose environmental components. The course will provide me with theoretical insights on core concepts and issues in the forestry and environment sectors. The course on qualitative and quantitative research methods will allow me to apply the knowledge gained in the management, conservation and sustainable development of biodiversity resources, environmental protection and research work. I intend to focus my efforts on researching and implementing community forest management with benefit sharing.
If I am accepted to participate in this course in Australia, I will bring in the in-depth knowledge gained from the course that will be applied to community forest management. I will learn new research methods and valuable research experiences, sharpen analytical skills and help me become an independent researcher. With such practical experience, I will also become an effective consultant for forest development policies and techniques in Vietnam. I hope to experience and approach creative teaching methods throughout the course, which will broaden my mind and enhance my research ability. By studying and working with scholars and friends in an Australian university, I hope to establish an academic network where my Vietnamese colleagues can share ideas and experiences to Improve our professional development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80927835052 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33457349304 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0284745858 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.222222222 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0990048842076 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406385537412 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025416003551 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775039951733 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275041864717 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.06136585366 132% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.