The diagram illustrates the cyclical process of recycling plastic bottles. The flow of process consists of 9 steps including disposing, filtering, crushing, forming raw material and producing new commodities.
At first, the cycle starts with the disposal of garbages into the trash bin. All the trashes are then collected in the truck and brought to the recycling unit. The plastic garbages are filtered where the recyclable ones will be used. In addition, these bottles are gathered and later made compact in the form of cubes. After compressing, the next step will be crumbling the blocks using a grinding machine. The pieces of plastic which are produced then go into the washing process.
Moreover, the clean plastic crumbles are poured into a special machine to generate smaller plastic particles. The heating process comes after this step with the aim of creating the raw material. Having the raw material done, in the end, it is transformed into final products such as recycled bottles, bags, pencils, and any other possible commodity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, then, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25595238095 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59408422361 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7656315388 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2727272727 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128472833685 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536953307946 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527139260195 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912492026509 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230266460309 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.