Misfortune may occur to anyone in diverse ways and at unexpected times. While some people view the acceptance of bad circumstances as the right thing to do, others believe that trying to alleviate the situation is better. In this essay, I will provide each perspective’s explanation and be continued with my personal opinion.
In response to the misfortune, the first argument explains that it is the truest one to accept it. Some cultures would treat this event as a test which is directly given by the Almighty. Furthermore, having misfortune means that humankind is blessed with the opportunity to experience a challenge in their life to achieve something greater. We can see this view when someone is forced to resign from their work, it may mean that the Almighty is preparing something bigger than the current job. In effect, the view leads people to a more grateful and positive-minded life.
On the other hand, some people counter the previous view by claiming that we have to show some efforts on improving the bad situation. This perspective provides a more realistic way of handling the situation. Moreover, it is believed that something must be done to tackle the misfortune such as finding another job when someone is unemployed. As a result, people do not have to endure it for a long time.
Personally, my view aligns with the second perspective. I believe that in this merit-based society, everyone is able to have a better life by showing some effort. Accepting the misfortune is only the initial step. However, the most important thing is how someone faces the situation which is by giving some tries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...’s explanation and be continued with my personal opinion. In response to the misfortune, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83856078148 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578754578755 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0389827073 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239658902827 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692877370348 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819296947089 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15010904402 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053784231426 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.