The chart and graph compare the number of Japanese who spent their holidays overseas from 1985 to 1995
with the proportion of them who visited Australia.
In 1985, only about five million Japanese travelled abroad, after which the number increased steadily. By 1990,
the figure had more than doubled to 11 million. Apart from a slight drop the following year, the upward trend
continued until the end of the period, when numbers reached over 15 million.
While Australia was the destination for under 2% of Japanese tourists in 1985, this percentage had risen to
over 6% by 1994. The proportion grew consistently, apart from a slight fall in 1990 (4.5% to 4%). After reaching
its 1994 peak, the percentage declined marginally to 6% in 1995.
Overall, despite the relatively small proportion of Japanese tourists coming to Australia, the increase in the
country’s share of the Japanese tourist market corresponded closely with the growth in Japanese tourism
overseas generally, with a trebling of both in the ten-year period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2754491018 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66672194476 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634730538922 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3515729215 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275903147261 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103321217732 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924192081272 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997919224164 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939175333126 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.