In this century, the global issue has expanded to a more diverse problem and presents a direct threat to the world such as environmental issues. Responding to this, some people identify the extinction of flora and fauna species as the core problem while others argue that many ecological issues are more critical. I view both perspectives as equally important considering the interrelated impact the problem produces.
The first stance emphasizes the disappearance of many plant and animal species serves as the most important one. Since it leads to the extinction of certain kinds especially the endemic creatures such as komodo in Indonesia. In result, this may cause disturbance to the ecosystem because komodo as the predator is disappearing. Therefore, this argument emphasizes the instability of living creatures’ ecosystems.
Responding to this, some people argue that many problems are considered more critical besides the extinction of flora fauna. The implication of environmental issues intersect with several areas in life. For instance, the food and water scarcity due to soil degradation and the increasing sea level due to melting Antarctic ice equally contribute to a severe impact. In effect, the negative impact not only reaches the flora and fauna but so does the human kind.
In my opinion, both perspectives demonstrate the right arguments in terms of the potential impact of the ecological problem. However, my view aligns with the second stance. The initial argument only accounts for the partial creatures whereas the latter one illustrates a more general view. I believe that problems like soil degradation which leads to water and food scarcity will result in the disappearance of all living creatures including flora, fauna, and human race.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
... stance emphasizes the disappearance of many plant and animal species serves as the most i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42238267148 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91590841123 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6182995924 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205122151986 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675169437016 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613983736142 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126311080174 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766689265357 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.