The graph above demonstrates the overall amount of Japanese tourist in foreign countries and the percentage of Australia as Japanese's destination country. The upward trends are shown in both graph with the occurrences of falling lines a few times along the period.
The level of Australia's share between the year of 1985 to 1995 aligns with the one in the overall amount graph. In addition, both had their peaks two times which happened in the middle and end of the period. However, their highest amount along the graph didn't stand in the same year with the upper graph's in 1990 and the lower one's in 1989. In other words, Australia's chart depicted a peak faster than the accumulated amount graph. This can be seen from the decreasing line in the lower chart while a peak occurred in the upper one.
In brief, the Australia's portion follows the trend of overall tourists' amount. Those graph illustrates a similar increasing trend with a minor difference.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... lines a few times along the period. The level of Australias share between the y...
^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...r, their highest amount along the graph didnt stand in the same year with the upper g...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition, in brief, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89570552147 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4758535049 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9464422987 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130941400754 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061456771349 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06652949861 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975891788428 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380064683888 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.