With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging. Face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
Nowadays, world population expands out at unbelievable rate. Correspondingly, communications get more and more necessary. I strongly believe, that direct connections will be always irreplaceable.
Firstly, when you have a conversation with someone who disagrees with you, communication with text or email can be inconvenient and ineffective. People fail to fully focus on or they just skim over the written words. Speaking online is not enough to share emotions and right attitudes either. Even those with good empathetic listening skills won’t be able to get the whole picture. Moreover, internet networks are not always available in all parts of the world that also creates obstacles to some extent. As psychologists say, with face-to-face communications emotions are more easily noticeable and agreement is easily achievable.
Trust is not a matter of technique, tricks, or tools but of character. Confidence cannot be built with text-messages. In-person conversations with people, eye contact, intensive interaction and simple actions improves socialization skills and contributes to raise sense of collaboration and responsibility that are so important in every working environment.
To sum up, I believe that no matter how developed technologies we have in person meetings are still the most important and effective way for communication and for building up better society.
- Global environmental issues are responsibility of rich nations not poor nations 56
- Global environmental issues are responsibility of rich nations not poor nations 78
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging Face to face communication will become a thing of the past 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble and agreement is easily achievable. Trust is not a matter of technique, tric...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, still, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73300970874 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40882137313 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.718446601942 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.1173036329 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8461538462 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8461538462 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220048767165 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613948530198 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670308938698 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104041065978 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642296276847 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.