The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013
The table shows household income and expenditure on food and clothes in an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013, together with 2 pie charts giving more details on the spending areas, broken down into 5 groups: fruits and vegetables, meat and fish, dairy products, other food and drinks and finally clothes.
Overall, total income had fallen during the time 2010 to 2013. However, spending on food and clothes rose significantly and we have also seen some changes of the percentage in the areas they spend money on.
Only slightly under half of the total income in 2010 was spent on food and clothes, whilst it had the highest total income, about 29,000 euro. The citizens mainly spent their money on three areas: meat and fish (25%), clothes (22%), fruits and vegetables (20%). On the other hand, other food and drinks and dairy products accounts for just under 20% (18% and 15% respectively) and they also were the least spending areas in 2010.
On contrast, although total income had fallen, at around 4,000 euro in 2013, expenditure on food and clothes rose significantly to slightly over half of its income. People tend to eat much more fruits and vegetables hence the highest percentage. There is a significant decline in consuming meat and fish, by 25% to 15%. also, daily products rose to 20% and it was no longer the least spending area while other food and drinks remains the same percentage at 18%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food and drinks and finally clothes. Overall, total income had fallen during ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge in the areas they spend money on. Only slightly under half of the total in...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re the least spending areas in 2010. On contrast, although total income had f...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 321, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...consuming meat and fish, by 25% to 15%. also, daily products rose to 20% and it was ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 6.8 309% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82113821138 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32973292376 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6641099848 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315321588726 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1091963947 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11973701387 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212720212365 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134352994482 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.