Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world, with serious results for the environment. What do you think can be done to solve this problem?
Support your opinion with reasons and examples from your own knowledge and experience
We have been talking about environmental issues for decades. And it seems that more and more problems would arise as the world is constantly changing. Particularly, the logging industry has seen a remarkable increase in extent. For me, people need to take action and join hands on solving this regardless of who they are, and this must be done extensively, not just within the government and environmental organisations.
Each individual can contribute to the defense of the forest even if you are just a primary student. Honestly, you don't need to do something overwhelming or intense, just raise your awareness of the indispensability of forest to our habitat and bear it in mind in whatever you do, on whatever decision you make. For example, when it comes to purchasing furniture, you might cross things made from wooden materials off the list. Some alternatives can be a good choice for your bed frames, kitchen tables,...that aren't necessarily made of solid wood, such as artificial wood, wood plus plastic, iron, etc. reducing the need for wooden consumption also helps a great deal in reducing the number of trees felling. I strongly believe that each person's adjustment in daily chores can add up to a spectacular change in the future.
However, it is the government and the local authority in a country that plays a vital role in solving deforestation. The law should be tightened and punishment should be more severe to those illegal loggers. Due to the lucrative profit from this practice, people and companies don't hesitate to intensely cut down myriad trees and become more violent. Enforcing the law may be accompanied by empowering the forestry to handle those aggressive people. On the other hand, more job opportunities and living conditions should be improved so that people are not drawn to the logging industry in order to make a living.
In summary, as long as there is a need for wood, deforestation still continues to increase. However, taking action step by step and persistently towards the issue is promisingly adding up to a change. And this cannot be achieved by a single group of defenders, it needs the participation of all people sharing the same atmosphere on Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e just a primary student. Honestly, you dont need to do something overwhelming or in...
^^^^
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...oice for your bed frames, kitchen tables,...that arent necessarily made of solid w...
^^
Line 4, column 511, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...your bed frames, kitchen tables,...that arent necessarily made of solid wood, such as...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 739, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s felling. I strongly believe that each persons adjustment in daily chores can add up t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rom this practice, people and companies dont hesitate to intensely cut down myriad t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, honestly, however, if, may, so, still, for example, in summary, such as, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03542234332 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96433471917 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596730245232 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7792131957 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186693105682 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475189090892 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333721959613 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993733682822 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409907144901 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.