Inspite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Nowadays, due to the development of technology and science, people have reached many achievements in agriculture. However, there are still hunger situations in many areas. The essay will present the reasons and the solutions to this issue.
There are some justifications for the problems mentioned. The difference between the technology and infrastructure status in these areas and the others does not provide enough conditions for the cultivation activities to become more effective. Moreover, there are a large gap in people’s knowledge between these areas and the rest. People in there do not have knowledge and experience enough, do not get access to modern machines and technique, therefore, do not have ability to contribute to the development of agriculture. Most importantly, the political statement in some areas, such as Syria, Afghanistan and so on are not stable. Many developed countries like America, Russia, etc. have intervened in these countries which lead to many wars and violence in these nations. As a result, people in there have to spend their time to hide and survive instead of focusing on developing in agriculture.
For all explanation presented above, there are some following remedies for this predicament. Firstly, many aiding and communication campaign should be implemented to raise the awareness of people around the world to support food, technologies and even human resources. Next, education aid need making in these areas for people to acknowledge and get access to modern technique and machines. Last but not least, developed countries need to boost the process of reaching agreement to pay back the peace to people who deserve it as human rights.
In conclusion, many causes have impact on the development of agriculture in some areas resulting the starvation in there. Even it may take a long time to resolve, many actions should be taken to gain achievement as soon as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hungered'.
Suggestion: hungered
...n agriculture. However, there are still hunger situations in many areas. The essay wil...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'gaps'?
Suggestion: gaps
... effective. Moreover, there are a large gap in people's knowledge between thes...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 965.302439024 169% => OK
No of words: 306.0 196.424390244 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32679738562 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00643648599 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 106.607317073 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 283.868780488 186% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4547795248 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8823529412 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161938325783 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527371018283 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357556515798 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108260921579 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438278783817 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 40.7170731707 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.