In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be improving existing public transport.
It is considered that in some countries, a big amount of money should be spent on establishing new railway tracks for fast trains between areas while some people believe that existing public transport should be developed with that money. In my opinion, there are many benefit brought about when new lines are built for fast trains.
On one hand, with high expense paid on building new railway lines, the transport systems will be improved significantly. First of all, with the evolution of technology nowadays, the construction of new railway lines for fast train is very easily achieved. Therefore, It takes a short term time to accomplish new kind of transporting. Another point, fast train is more modern and convenient than any existing public transport so this establishment will decrease the number of people using motorcycles or overloading public transport which lead to the drop in traffic jam and injuries.. Last but not least, train is one of the most secured transport in the world leading to the reduce in the traffic accidents. For example, in Vietnam, a lot of people will choose fast and affordable fast trains instead of motorcycle which is the highest cause of traffic jam and accidents. As a result, transport system will witness the considerable improvement.
On the other hand, investing in existing public transport also have a great deal of benefits. The first point to be mentioned is that more developing public transport will enhance the number of people using them. This factor also reduces the number of people using their private transports and the number of traffic accidents. In addition, implementing reconstruction of former transport will cost less money than other methods so that money can be used for other policies for developing society.
To sum up, reconstructing current public transport can be quite beneficial. However, investing in new lines for fast train can bring about much more advantages which can have positive impact of transport system as well as living standard of citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun benefit seems to be countable; consider using: 'many benefits'.
Suggestion: many benefits
...th that money. In my opinion, there are many benefit brought about when new lines are built ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... to the drop in traffic jam and injuries.. Last but not least, train is one of the...
^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cured transport in the world leading to the reduce in the traffic accidents. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...in Vietnam, a lot of people will choose fast and affordable fast trains instead of m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, kind of, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78501829535 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512121212121 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3422492547 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7333333333 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45707684381 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145696896245 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105007630724 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286177727009 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109341202438 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.