the line graph

Essay topics:

the line graph

The line graph shows how much fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.It is clear that the number of hamburgers and pizza became the most famous in Australian teenagers.
In 1975, the rate of fish and chip was the highest consumption of all fast foods about 100times per hours . However, there was fluctuated in the amount of chips and fish from 1980 to 1985. Demanding of Australian teenagers about fish and chips became lower than in 2000 about 40 times.
On the other hand, pizza and hamburgers was trending of Australian teenagers , there was increased significantly between 1975 and 1995 with 15 times; 25 times ;40 times ;77 times , respectively and constanted consumption in 2000.The rate of hamburgers rose gradually between 1975 and 1985 and remained stable until 2000 . it was trending which attracted almost young generation in Australia

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.It is clear that the number of hamburgers ...
^^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... all fast foods about 100times per hours . However, there was fluctuated in the am...
^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ers was trending of Australian teenagers , there was increased significantly betwe...
^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h 15 times; 25 times ;40 times ;77 times , respectively and constanted consumption...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...vely and constanted consumption in 2000.The rate of hamburgers rose gradually betwe...
^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etween 1975 and 1985 and remained stable until 2000 . it was trending which attra...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and 1985 and remained stable until 2000 . it was trending which attracted almost ...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... 1985 and remained stable until 2000 . it was trending which attracted almost you...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12676056338 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7040832187 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619718309859 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 196.2 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.830206324 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0676840788541 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342235533441 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076526191709 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684471066882 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967988265836 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.