The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how much fast food like pizza, hamburger, fish and chips were eaten by Australian adolescents from year 1975 till 2000.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that most popular fast food eaten by teenagers was hamburger, while pizza was second most consumed food per year. In 1985 and 1995 fast foods like hamburger and pizza were at same level of ingestion respectively. However, it was noted that fish and chips from the beginning of the period were highly consumed item that varied in its trend later on.
On the one hand, a significantly increasing trend in consumption of hamburger was observed from 1975 (about 10 times per year) rising to around 85 times per year in 1985. Furthermore, a gradual increase was noted from 1985 to 2000 reaching it to 100 times per year. Additionally, pizza showed a gradual steady rise in being eaten starting from about 7 times per year (1975) then reaching to around 85 times per year (1995). A plateau was seen from 1995 till year 2000 letting the feeding remain at same level.
On the other hand, fish and chips were highly eaten product in 1975 at 100 and then showed a decline of approximately 82 times per year in 1980. Moreover, arise was observed for a period of 5 years from 1980-1985 consuming it slightly below 100 times per year. Then there was a steep fall from 1985 till 2000 ending it at 40 times per year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60728744939 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39463331524 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477732793522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5567810457 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15317392881 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799170051635 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522035447381 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129312335836 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568913273409 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.