The given graph represents the alteration in fast food consumption in the youngers of Australia between 1975 until 2000 years. It is obvious that Fish and Chips decreased within 25 years, while the number of hambugers and pizza increased at the same time.
At first glance, Fish and Chips comsumption was the highest with the number of 100 in 1975. In a 5 year period, it fells down and showed a slight increase in the following five year but couldn’t reached the starting point. From 1985 to 2000, a steady slump was witnessed and dropped just under 40 in 2000 years.
Compared to the Fish and Chips, both Pizza and Hamburgers were around the 10 although pizza was much lower in 1975.From 1975 to 1985, Hamburgers had a sharp increase and steadily continued rise up to 2000. It reached over 100 and become the most eaten food by the teenagers. In a simliar way, Pizza figured an exponantial increase between 1975 to 1995. However, in the last 5 year, it remained stable at around 83.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...0 although pizza was much lower in 1975.From 1975 to 1985, Hamburgers had a sharp in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69142857143 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50260925061 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617142857143 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5774530259 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167603369551 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654661089294 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630863139089 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115242321476 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132340404177 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.