The given line graph comparatively describes the eating habits of Australian youngsters including the amount and Kinds of fast food in the period 25 years.
Overall we can see that the fish and chips are the main source of eating for Australian Youngsters in the year of 1975 having rate of 100 times per year which is quite famous in the period soon after it has started decrease with a steady rate in 1980 chips and fish consumption has decreased from 100 times to 80 times per year, and then again at has shown a steady increase 95 times but soon after again it has started falling down and reached the lowest rate among the other food to 40 times per year in the year of 2000.
In Contrast to Fish and Chips, the type of fast food like Pizza and Hamburgers had very low rate in the year of 1975 and which is 5 to 9 per year which is quite low as compared to Fish and Chips, but the consumption of Hamburgers has shown as enormous increase over the period of 10 years from 1975 to 1985 but soon after it has shown a gradual increase till the year of 2000 and rated as 100 times per year same as the starting era of fish and chips comparatively opposite and whereas the Pizza also has shown gradual increase till 1995 and rated as 85 times per year and then has a still increase till 2000.
Finally the eating habits of Australian youngsters in terms of amount and kinds of foods had a quite opposite relation between Fish, chips and other fast foods in over 25 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luding the amount and Kinds of fast food in the period 25 years. Overall we ca...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...then has a still increase till 2000. Finally the eating habits of Australian youngst...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, still, then, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32374100719 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2053850933 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39928057554 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 69.0 22.4926829268 307% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 202.187258501 43.030603864 470% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 300.5 112.824112599 266% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 69.5 22.9334400587 303% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.25 5.23603664747 349% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158704885709 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135466132474 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659505443312 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135466132474 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659505443312 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 33.7 13.2329268293 255% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.5 10.3012195122 248% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 8.96 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 11.4329268293 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 29.6 10.9970731707 269% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.