The pie chart illustrates the amount of revenue and expenditure in USA on children's charity received in 2016. overall it can be seen that the revenue source has donated food which is most of the revenue amounting 53,561,580 dollars and while expenditure is program services amounting 53,224,896 dollars.
In Addition the Revenue source is depending upon food donation including Community contribution of 10.4 percent, program revenue of 2.2 percent, investment income and government grants is rated as 0.2 percent each and other incomes are rated as 0.4 percent also includes the food donation of 86.6 percent. whereas the expenditures consists on fundraising of 2.6 percent, management and general of 1.6 percent also includes the program services having highest amount of 95.8 percent.
In contrast the Revenue source food donation is much bigger then other categories comparatively same as expenditures program services, therefore the amount has been divided in 5 categories in revenue source and only in 3 categories for expenditure so it is clear that the given amount is enough for the expenditure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
... on childrens charity received in 2016. overall it can be seen that the revenue source ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Addition,
...ces amounting 53,224,896 dollars. In Addition the Revenue source is depending upon fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lars. In Addition the Revenue source is depending upon food donation including Community ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...udes the food donation of 86.6 percent. whereas the expenditures consists on fundraisin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the expenditures consists on fundraising of 2.6 percent, management and general ...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fundraising of 2.6 percent, management and general of 1.6 percent also includes...
^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
...cent also includes the program services having highest amount of 95.8 percent. In contrast ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...g highest amount of 95.8 percent. In contrast the Revenue source food donation is muc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...nue source food donation is much bigger then other categories comparatively same as ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42196531792 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9016419855 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8213169136 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.6 112.824112599 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4 5.23603664747 275% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0672706087694 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676247321167 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945595687373 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057049441667 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556692458117 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.