The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000
The line graph illustrates the amount of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia between 1975 and 2000. Overall, it is evident that the consumption of fish and chip declined, whereas the amount of pizza and hamburgers consumed rose over a 25-year period.
In 1975, the amount of fish and chips consumed was dramatically higher than pizza and hamburgers, at 100 times eaten a year for fish and chips and approximately 5 times eaten and 10 times eaten per year for pizza and hamburgers respectively. However, fish and chips consumption fluctuated between 100 times eaten and 80 times eaten from 1975 to 1985. By contrast, this figures for pizza and hamburgers significantly increased over this period.
By 1985, the consumption of fish and chips began to considerably decreased and it was only consumed just under 40 times per year in 2000. Contrast with fish and chips, pizza consumption continued to grow to 1995 and then it remained stable ai just under 80 times between 1995 and 2000. The figure for hamburgers slightly increased in 1985 and reached around 100 times in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s consumed rose over a 25-year period. In 1975, the amount of fish and chips co...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nificantly increased over this period. By 1985, the consumption of fish and chi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00549450549 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7278933272 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472527472527 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0093400844 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164310845608 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104812149853 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154792490051 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157923740979 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132724582521 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.