The line graph below shows the changes in the price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010
The given line chart illustrates the Outokumpu firms’ share value in Euros between January 2016 and December 2010
Overall, the value of companies share was in its great performance for over first two years, moreover, it reached its peak price. However, it then sharply dropped to its lowest level, before it saw a gradual increase and a small fluctuation.
To begin, in 2016, the price of Outokumpu companies share stood at 13. However, over 2016, there was a significant increase and reaching a peak of 32. It was then followed by a gradual decrease to 21 in 2008. Next, the value of share rose progressively to 30, before it declined dramatically and hit a low of 8 in 2009. There was a moderate increase for over six months of 2019 which was rising around 7 Euro from 8 to 15. Then, Middle of 2009 to 2010 saw a fluctuation in the price of share which its value was between 12 and 18 euro.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 405, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Euros'.
Suggestion: Euros
...onths of 2019 which was rising around 7 Euro from 8 to 15. Then, Middle of 2009 to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 532, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
...e which its value was between 12 and 18 euro.
^^^^
Line 9, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h its value was between 12 and 18 euro.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59509202454 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62917615949 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8589263001 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182883352111 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074637507013 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092375117902 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162114128432 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116231933678 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.