The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the fluctuations in the Outokumpu share prices in euros during five-years period from January 2006 to December 2010.
Overall, although the line has significant changes during the all presented time, but it has almost the same price both at the start and at the end of period.
The first period from January of 2006 until January of 2007 the amount of price growths and attains over 30 euros. It is the maximum during all this time. Then we can see small fluctuations of price, which decrease in 2007 and sharp jump to upward occurs at the beginning 2008 year, which reaches 30 euro.
However, after high cost the steep decline happens, which achieves the lowest point between 5 and 10 euros in December 2008. In the middle of 2009 the price equal 15 euros and after this the line changes between 10 and 20 euros until the end of 2010, where has almost the same cost such as the beginning of period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
...e beginning 2008 year, which reaches 30 euro. However, after high cost the steep ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... until the end of 2010, where has almost the same cost such as the beginning of p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64242424242 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2217226252 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7847238294 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243868596549 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113602253026 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922124772776 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160591120761 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881138361365 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.