The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010.
The pie charts demonstrate the expenditures of household in 1950 and 2010 and compare for both the main categories.
Overall, the housing expenses in 2010 decrease compared to 1950, but expenditures for the rest of the list rise than in 1950.
According to pie chart in 2010 the part of costs on housing consist 22 percent. So, the difference between the spending on housing in 1950 and 2010 amount 50.1 per cent. Also, decline of expenses for education are observed in 2010. The costs on education on the second pie chart become slightly less than in 1950 and the distinction equal 0.3 percent.
There is a trend to increase spending on the rest of the list. The expenditures for food significantly grow from 11.2 percent in 1950 to 34 percent 2010. The average household became to spend money on health care in 2010 more than 1950. Also, the most noticeably costs on point “other”, which have risen almost 15 percent during 60 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 22 percent. So, the difference between the spending on housing in 1950 and 2010...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nding on housing in 1950 and 2010 amount 50.1 per cent. Also, decline of expense...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79754601227 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60330973455 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5473896331 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.2 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348642754461 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146058600432 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108486895717 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245615725983 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796968305252 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.