A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays people actively use animals for their own purposes, but there are different views on this, one of them think that this is normal behaving, but others believe that animals shouldn't be exploited and have to have rights equal human rights.
On one hand, people need animals that help in various areas of life. Firstly, people use some animals to help them in producing and providing foods. In many countries, people use horses to move among various places, or to cultivate farmers areas. Also, some farms animals such as chicken and sheep are slaughtered for their meats. Without cow or goat milk, meats and other, people would suffer from lack of nutrition. Secondly, animals are used for certain experiments by scientists for the sake of humanity. For example, British scientists have tested medicaments on monkeys to defined the side effects.
On the other hand, some species of animals are on endangered state and some of them have already been extinct due to insignificant people needs. Further, some animal experiments aren’t justified, such as research for cosmetics, rather than diseases or killing them for furs. This tendency destroys innocent creatures and can bring negative consequences. For instance, today, according to data of International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources the red wolves are on endangered state due to poacher, who hunter them for valuable fur.
In conclusion, I can say that sometimes using animals bring benefits for people, but sometimes this is hurt nature and creatures. As for me, using animals for insignificant needs is abnormal and people should think about their doings and consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...having, but others believe that animals shouldnt be exploited and have to have rights eq...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed for certain experiments by scientists for the sake of humanity. For example, ...
^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sh scientists have tested medicaments on monkeys to defined the side effects. O...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the side effects. On the other hand, some species of animals are on endangere...
^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a hunter'.
Suggestion: who is a hunter
...are on endangered state due to poacher, who hunter them for valuable fur. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I can say that sometimes using animals bring benefits for people, but sometimes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29323308271 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67937265421 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8086643362 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344529181365 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123505462054 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074351469261 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22810448204 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548747877722 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.