The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of outokumpu companies in euros between january 2006 and december 2010.

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of outokumpu companies in euros between january 2006 and december 2010.

A glance at the line graph provided reveals the changes in the share price of outokumpu companies from january 2006 to december 2010.

Overall, it is interesting to note that share price of this company was highest in mid of 2006 and 2007.After that, it topped again in 2008.

In 2006, share price was 15 euros . This price declined in whole year of 2007. In addition to it, the price went down from 30 euros to 22 euros in 2007 and this changes was very fluctuated in this year.

This figure shows significant changes in 2008. At the begining of 2008,the price stood between 25 and 20 euros then increased about 30 euros. The price extremely decreased around 5 euros at the end of 2008.

Between the end of 2008 and 2010, the changes of outokumpu company's share price increased alternately.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...any was highest in mid of 2006 and 2007.After that, it topped again in 2008. In 20...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...08. In 2006, share price was 15 euros . This price declined in whole year of 20...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 662.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69503546099 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39593983086 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6324880871 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5555555556 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464619273501 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208454029321 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154822941981 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288191201388 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15663554501 0.0819641961636 191% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.