The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from.

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from.

The line chart, combined with the table, provides an overview of the number of overseas visitors, from six different countries, traveling to Australia annually from 1975 to 2005.

It is clear that there was a massive increase in the number of overseas tourists visiting Australia over a period of 30 years.

According to the table, Japanese visitors contributed by far the largest number of tourists throughout the surveyed period.
In 1975, Australia recorded only 10 million overseas tourists coming to their country. However, this figure gradually rose over the 30-year period, peaking at approximately 20 million people in 2005. Noticeably, the number of overseas tourists saw an increase of 5 million people each decade, with the exception of the second decade, which recorded the tourist figure rose by 10 million people.

With regard to the table given, the total number of tourists worldwide in 2005 was 30.4 million people, which was over threefold as high as that in 1975. The number of tourists from Japan accounted for almost half of the total figure, with 12 million people in 2005. Korean visitors contributed to 2.9 and 9.1 million people in 1975 and 2005 respectively. These figures were over twice as high as those for China, the US, Britain as well as other European countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 293, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...crease of 5 million people each decade, with the exception of the second decade, which recorded the t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, well, as to, as well as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14084507042 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58115217222 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539906103286 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2192928039 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13735641488 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651146383431 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550216144565 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100565389807 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533917641599 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.