More and more children are performing their talents on reality show. Some people welcome this as a way to nurture young talents; others are worried that rising to fame at such an early age may disrupt children’s personal development. Please argumentation to highlight you opinion on this matter. Give resons and specific examples to support your opinions.
Over the past few years, we have seen an upsurge trend of children appearing on loads of talent shows. The issue of whether this tendency is beneficial for children’s self-development or not remains a subject of intense debate. In my opinion, I strongly contend that the advantages gained far outweigh the dangers.
There are several reasons why a child will possible benefit from participating in reality shows. To begin with, being exposed to the public at an early age allows youngsters to dramatically improve self-confidence as well as hone communication ability. Thanks to meeting an array of talented, prodigy peers, children will probably be able to not only open their minds to the world, but also be more aware of their current capability. Under this circumstance, young talents must have grasped the significance of carrying on nourishing their innate talents on a daily basis, and thus they can eventually get the ball over the line in the future.
On top of that, only by monetizing their special abilities can youngsters be financially independent without parental support. Some people contend that, however, this is fist where danger lies. Yet, in the materialistic and consumer-driven world, there are a vast variety of temptations, which could lead a temporary famous child to a depraved future. Obviously we cannot turn a blind eye on this issue, therefore it is essential that schools along with parents ought to equip children with sufficient knowledge and skills to navigate their own financial situations.
In conclusion, I completely maintain that the potential advantages children obtained from performing on the talent shows are much more prominent in comparison with the possible drawbacks. Thus, instead of promoting the idea of prohibiting young talents from exposing themselves on TV shows, we should guide them how to handle their fame and success.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29666666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01613991718 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656666666667 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4995935998 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.230769231 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242394897357 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716107288782 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460419696368 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134995229119 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375374182003 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.